Intel J3455 vs Celeron N3150

older Released July, 2016

Intel J3455

1.5 GHz
Quad core

Front view of Intel J3455

Reasons to buy the Intel J3455

	Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,564.5		Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,402.5
	Newer Jul, 2016

VS

older Released January, 2015

Intel Celeron N3150

1.6 GHz
Quad core

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to buy the Celeron N3150

	Higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz		Better performance per watt 10.68 pt/W
	Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.75 GHz

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel J3455

Front view of Intel J3455

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Intel Celeron N3150

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel J3455

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3455

Report a correction

Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

4,564.5

vs

2,712

Around 70% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Better geekbench 3 single core score

1,402.5

vs

835

Around 70% better geekbench 3 single core score

Newer

Jul, 2016

vs

Jan, 2015

Release date over 1 years later

Front view of Intel Celeron N3150

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction

Higher GPU clock speed

320 MHz

vs

250 MHz

Around 30% higher GPU clock speed

Better performance per watt

10.68 pt/W

vs

8.3 pt/W

Around 30% better performance per watt

Better overclocked clock speed (Air)

1.75 GHz

vs

1.5 GHz

More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

4,564.5

2,712

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,402.5

835

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,010.65 MB/s

335.9 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

2,153

1,674

PassMark (Single Core)

785

470

summary	J3455	vs	Celeron N3150
Clock speed	1.5 GHz		1.6 GHz
Cores	Quad core		Quad core
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Supports trusted computing	No		No
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	10W		6W
Annual home energy cost	2.41 $/year		1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost	8.76 $/year		5.26 $/year
Performance per watt	8.3 pt/W		10.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption	8.13W		4.88W
bus
Architecture	FSB		FSB
Number of links	1		1

details	J3455	vs	Celeron N3150
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	4		4
Manufacture process	14 nm		14 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	1.5 GHz		1.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.5 GHz		1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	1.5 GHz		1.75 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics 500		Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported	3		3
GPU clock speed	250 MHz		320 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels	Dual Channel		Dual Channel
Supports ECC	No		No
Maximum bandwidth	12,800 MB/s		25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size	8,192 MB		8,192 MB

Intel J3455

Report a correction

Intel Celeron N3150

Report a correction

VS

Intel Celeron J1900 vs J3455

VS

Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3150

Comments

comments powered by Disqus