Intel J3455 vs Celeron J1900 |
Released July, 2016
Intel J3455
- 1.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3455
 | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | More number of displays supported 3 |
| | Significantly better performance per watt 8.3 pt/W | | Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,564.5 |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1900
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Significantly better performance per watt | 8.3 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | Around 95% better performance per watt | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,564.5 | vs | 2,927 | More than 55% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,402.5 | vs | 924 | More than 50% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 250 MHz | More than 2.8x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of J3455 vs Celeron J1900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3455 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 250 MHz | 688 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | J3455 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 8.3 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel J3455  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1900 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $125 | |
| J1900 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| J1900 vs N3150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $94 | |
| J1900 vs J2900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| J1900 vs 1037U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $72 | |
| J1900 vs J1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| J1900 vs J3160 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $75 | |
| J1900 vs 1007U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
