Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3455

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3455

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 28.44W 3.5x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 8.3 pt/W vs 3.45 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jan, 2014 Release date over 2 years later
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 3.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron G1820TE

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron G1820TE

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,295 vs 785 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 350 MHz vs 250 MHz 40% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3455 vs Celeron G1820TE

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3455
2,153

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

J3455  vs
Celeron G1820TE 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 35W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 8.3 pt/W 3.45 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0

details

J3455  vs
Celeron G1820TE 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 2.2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 HD (Haswell)
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 250 MHz 350 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel J3455
Report a correction
Intel Celeron G1820TE
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus