Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Intel Celeron 3765U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3455

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3455

Report a correction
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better performance per watt 8.3 pt/W vs 6.87 pt/W More than 20% better performance per watt
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 12.19W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Apr, 2015 Release date over 1 years later
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 13.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 3.61 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 3765U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3765U

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,092 vs 785 Around 40% better PassMark (Single core) score
Higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz vs 250 MHz 20% higher GPU clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3455 vs Celeron 3765U

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3455
2,153

PassMark (Single Core)

J3455
785

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

J3455  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 15W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 8.3 pt/W 6.87 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1

details

J3455  vs
Celeron 3765U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.5 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 250 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 16,384 MB
Intel J3455
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3765U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus