Intel J3455 vs Atom C2538 |
Released July, 2016
Intel J3455
- 1.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3455
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
| | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Newer Jul, 2016 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2538
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2538
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the J3455 vs Atom C2538
clock speed
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3455 | vs | Atom C2538 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 10W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | J3455 | vs | Atom C2538 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 250 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 65,536 MB | |
 Intel J3455  Report a correction |  Intel Atom C2538 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| J3455 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| J3455 vs N3150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| J3455 vs N3450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| J3455 vs J4205 | ||
| | VS |  |
| J3455 vs J3355 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| J3455 vs 4025U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $161 | ||
| J3455 vs N3700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
