0 Comments
| Intel J3455 vs Atom C2538 |
Released July, 2016
Intel J3455
- 1.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3455
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2016 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Atom C2538
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom C2538
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz |
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Newer | Jul, 2016 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Slightly lower typical power consumption | 8.13W | vs | 12.19W | Around 35% lower typical power consumption | |||
Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | Around 35% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.4 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | 60% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Features Key features of the J3455 vs Atom C2538
clock speed
J3455
1.5 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (air)
J3455
1.5 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
J3455
1.5 GHz
Atom C2538
2.4 GHz
TDP
J3455
10W
Atom C2538
15W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3455 | vs | Atom C2538 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 10W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 2.41 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 8.76 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 8.13W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | J3455 | vs | Atom C2538 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | None | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 500 | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | 250 MHz | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 65,536 MB |
Intel J3455 ![]() | Intel Atom C2538 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J3455 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3455 vs J4205 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | ||
J3455 vs 4025U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3455 vs N3450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3455 vs J3160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
J3455 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3455 vs J3355 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||