Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3355

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3355

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 77.19W 9.5x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 7.63 pt/W vs 1.51 pt/W More than 5x better performance per watt
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Jan, 2008 Release date over 8 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 9.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 9.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Core2 Quad Q9550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.83 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.99 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports trusted computing Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better PassMark score 4,002 vs 1,313 More than 3x better PassMark score
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,199 vs 881 More than 35% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.03 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3355 vs Core2 Quad Q9550

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3355
1,313

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

J3355  vs
Core2 Quad Q9550 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2.83 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 10W 95W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 7.63 pt/W 1.51 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 77.19W

details

J3355  vs
Core2 Quad Q9550 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 3.99 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 4.03 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 3.99 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 250 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel J3355
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus