Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3355

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3355

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Significantly better performance per watt 7.63 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 881 vs 534 Around 65% better PassMark (Single core) score
Newer Jul, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 250 MHz More than 2.8x higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3355 vs Celeron J1900

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3355
1,313

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

J3355  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 2 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 500 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 250 MHz 688 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

J3355  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 10W 10W
Annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 7.63 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 8.13W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel J3355
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus