Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel J3160

Front view of Intel J3160
Front view of Intel Celeron N3000

Intel Celeron N3000

CPUBoss Winner
Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3160

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3160

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.04 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.24 GHz vs 1.04 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.24 GHz vs 1.04 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Jan, 2015 Release date a year later
Front view of Intel Celeron N3000

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3000

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better performance per watt 11.42 pt/W vs 9.06 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3160 vs Celeron N3000

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3160
1,832
Celeron N3000
917

PassMark (Single Core)

J3160
529
Celeron N3000
480

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 J3160  vs
Celeron N3000 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.04 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption
TDP 6W 4W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 0.96 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 3.5 $/year
Performance per watt 9.06 pt/W 11.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 3.25W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 J3160  vs
Celeron N3000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.24 GHz 1.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.24 GHz 1.04 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.24 GHz 1.04 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 320 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Intel J3160
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss