0 Comments
| Intel J3160 vs Celeron N3000 |
Released January, 2016
Intel J3160
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3160
![]() | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.24 GHz |
![]() | More cores 4 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3000
- 1.04 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Celeron N3000
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
![]() | Better performance per watt 11.42 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Celeron N3000CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.24 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Better performance per watt | 11.42 pt/W | vs | 9.06 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt |
Benchmarks Real world tests of J3160 vs Celeron N3000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
J3160
1,832
Celeron N3000
917
PassMark (Single Core)
J3160
529
Celeron N3000
480
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3160 | vs | Celeron N3000 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 4W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.96 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 3.5 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.06 pt/W | 11.42 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 3.25W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | J3160 | vs | Celeron N3000 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
Intel J3160 ![]() | Intel Celeron N3000 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
J3160 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
J3160 vs N3150 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | ||
J3160 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3160 vs J3455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
J3160 vs N3160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | ||
J3160 vs E3845 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | ||
J3160 vs N3700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||