Intel J3160 vs Celeron N3000 |
Released January, 2016
Intel J3160
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3160
 | Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.24 GHz |
| | More cores 4 | | More threads 4 |
VS
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3000
- 1.04 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Celeron N3000
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Better performance per watt 11.42 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Intel Celeron N3000CPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1.6 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.24 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2015 | Release date a year later | |||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better performance per watt | 11.42 pt/W | vs | 9.06 pt/W | More than 25% better performance per watt | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of J3160 vs Celeron N3000
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3160 | vs | Celeron N3000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 4W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.96 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 3.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 9.06 pt/W | 11.42 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 3.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | J3160 | vs | Celeron N3000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | 1.04 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 320 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel J3160  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron N3000 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | ||
| J3160 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| J3160 vs N3150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $300 | ||
| J3160 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| J3160 vs J3455 | ||
| | VS |  |
| J3160 vs N3160 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $52 | ||
| J3160 vs E3845 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $161 | ||
| J3160 vs N3700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
