0 Comments
| Intel J3160 vs Celeron J1900 |
Released January, 2016
Intel J3160
- 1.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3160
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 9.06 pt/W |
![]() | More number of displays supported 3 | ![]() | Newer Jan, 2016 |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1900
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel J3160CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per watt | 9.06 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | More than 2x better performance per watt | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 56,900 MB/s | vs | 346.5 MB/s | Around 164.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 320 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Significantly better turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | More than 20% better turbo clock speed | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.24 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.24 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of J3160 vs Celeron J1900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3160
2,587
Celeron J1900
2,927
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3160
832.5
Celeron J1900
924
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3160
346.5 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
J3160
1,832
Celeron J1900
1,863
PassMark (Single Core)
J3160
529
Celeron J1900
534
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3160 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 700 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | J3160 | vs | Celeron J1900 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.24 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.24 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.24 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 9.06 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel J3160 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1900 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $82 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron N3150 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | ||
Intel J3455 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$72 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron J1800 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $82 | |
Intel Pentium J2900 vs Celeron J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron 1037U vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $82 | |
Intel Celeron 1007U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||