Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel J3160

Front view of Intel J3160
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1900

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel J3160

Reasons to consider the
Intel J3160

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 9.06 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Jan, 2016 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 2 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 346.5 MB/s Around 164.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 854 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 20% better turbo clock speed
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.24 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2.24 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of J3160 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

J3160
2,587
Celeron J1900
2,927

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

J3160
832.5
Celeron J1900
924

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

J3160
346.5 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

J3160
1,832
Celeron J1900
1,863

PassMark (Single Core)

J3160
529
Celeron J1900
534

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 J3160  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 400 Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 700 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

 J3160  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.24 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.24 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.24 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption
TDP 6W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 9.06 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 8.13W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel J3160
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss