0 Comments
| Intel J3060 vs Celeron J1800 |
Released January, 2016
Intel J3060
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel J3060
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1800
- 2.41 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron J1800
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.41 GHz | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz | ![]() | Better turbo clock speed 792 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel J3060CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Significantly better performance per watt | 7.07 pt/W | vs | 3.97 pt/W | Around 80% better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Slightly better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 386.7 MB/s | vs | 60.6 MB/s | Around 6.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.41 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 320 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
Better turbo clock speed | 792 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 15% better turbo clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of J3060 vs Celeron J1800
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3060
1,703
Celeron J1800
1,661
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3060
892
Celeron J1800
964
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
J3060
386.7 MB/s
Celeron J1800
60.6 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
J3060
951
Celeron J1800
1,028
PassMark (Single Core)
J3060
513
Celeron J1800
554
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | J3060 | vs | Celeron J1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.41 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 688 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 700 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
details | J3060 | vs | Celeron J1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 2.58 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 6W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.07 pt/W | 3.97 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel J3060 ![]() | Intel Celeron J1800 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $72 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron 1037U vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$63 | $72 | |
Intel Atom D525 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $72 | |
Intel Celeron N3050 vs J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$150 | $72 | |
Intel Core i3 2100 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$378 | $393 | |
Intel Core i7 4720HQ vs 5500U | ||