Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.53 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 32 MB vs 24 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Lower typical power consumption 138.13W vs 150.31W Around 10% lower typical power consumption
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year vs 162.06 $/year Around 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year vs 44.57 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Itanium 9350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9350

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 4 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs 9350 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz
Itanium 9350
1.73 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9560  vs
9350 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 1.73 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 170W 185W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 44.57 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 162.06 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 150.31W

bus

Architecture QPI QPI
Number of links 1 1
Data rate 25,600 MB/s 19,200 MB/s
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 4,800 MT/s
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 2,400 MHz

details

Itanium 9560  vs
9350 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 32 MB 24 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 6 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 8 8

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus