Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 32 MB vs 8 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 73.94W vs 138.13W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 21.92 $/year vs 40.95 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 79.72 $/year vs 148.92 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Nov, 2012 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs Core i7 6700K 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 170W 91W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 21.92 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 79.72 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 73.94W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No

details

Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 6700K 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 32 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 8,000 MT/s
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 6700K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus