Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Itanium 9560

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Intel Core i7 4770K

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 32 MB vs 8 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 4770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 4770K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 138.13W 2x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 40.95 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 148.92 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jun, 2013 vs Nov, 2012 Release date 6 months later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs Core i7 4770K 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz
Core i7 4770K
3.5 GHz

L2 cache

Itanium 9560
4 MB
Core i7 4770K
1 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9560
32 MB
Core i7 4770K
8 MB

TDP

Itanium 9560
170W
Core i7 4770K
84W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 170W 84W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 20.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 73.58 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 68.25W

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No

details

 Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 4770K 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 32 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4600
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,250 MHz

bus
Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 0
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 4770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss