Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 32 MB vs 8 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 8 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Apr, 2012 Release date 6 months later
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year vs 42.19 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i7 3770K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3770K

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly lower typical power consumption 114.97W vs 138.13W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 112.39 $/year vs 148.92 $/year Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs Core i7 3770K 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz
Core i7 3770K
3.5 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 170W 77W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 42.19 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 112.39 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 114.97W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No

details

Itanium 9560  vs
Core i7 3770K 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 32 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3770K
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus