Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.53 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Opteron X1150

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron X1150

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 138.13W 10x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 148.92 $/year 10x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 40.95 $/year 10x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs Opteron X1150 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9560  vs
Opteron X1150 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Octa core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 170W 17W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 13.81W

details

Itanium 9560  vs
Opteron X1150 
L2 cache 4 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
AMD Opteron X1150
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus