Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9560

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.25 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 1 15 more threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3300+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3300+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 64 3300+ vs the Intel Itanium 9560.

Features Key features of the Itanium 9560  vs Athlon 64 3300+ 

clock speed

Itanium 9560
2.53 GHz
Athlon 64 3300+
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9560  vs
Athlon 64 3300+ 
Clock speed 2.53 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core
Socket type
LGA 1248
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes

details

Itanium 9560  vs
Athlon 64 3300+ 
Threads 16 1
L2 cache 4 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 138.13W N/A
Intel Itanium 9560
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3300+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus