Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9540

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9540

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 12 MB 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 1 15 more threads
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 4 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 5 years later
Front view of Intel Itanium 9110N

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9110N

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 12 MB/core vs 3 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 138.13W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 148.92 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 40.95 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9540  vs 9110N 

clock speed

Itanium 9540
2.13 GHz
Itanium 9110N
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9540  vs
9110N 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 170W 75W
Annual home energy cost 40.95 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 148.92 $/year 65.7 $/year
Typical power consumption 138.13W 60.94W

bus

Architecture QPI FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 3,200 MHz 533 MHz

details

Itanium 9540  vs
9110N 
Threads 16 1
L2 cache 4 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 24 MB 12 MB
L3 cache per core 3 MB/core 12 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 8 4

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Itanium 9540
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 9110N
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus