Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9540

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9540

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 0.26 MB More than 15.5x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 2.13 GHz vs 0.8 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 16 vs 1 15 more threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.26 MB/core More than 95% more l2 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Sep, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
Front view of Apple APL 2298

Reasons to consider the
Apple APL 2298

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Features Key features of the Itanium 9540  vs APL 2298 

clock speed

Itanium 9540
2.13 GHz
APL 2298
0.8 GHz

L2 cache

APL 2298
0.26 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9540  vs
APL 2298 
Clock speed 2.13 GHz 0.8 GHz
Cores Octa core Single core

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A PowerVR SGX535
GPU clock speed N/A 200 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

Itanium 9540  vs
APL 2298 
Threads 16 1
L2 cache 4 MB 0.26 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.26 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption 138.13W N/A
Intel Itanium 9540
Report a correction
Apple APL 2298
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus