0 Comments
| Intel Itanium 9540 vs AMD FX 9590 |
Released November, 2012
Intel Itanium 9540
- 2.13 GHz
- Octa core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9540
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | ![]() | Much more l3 cache 24 MB |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 138.13W | ![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 3 MB/core |
VS
Released July, 2013
AMD FX 9590
- 4.7 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 9590
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 4.7 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Newer Jul, 2013 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l3 cache | 24 MB | vs | 8 MB | 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 138.13W | vs | 178.75W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 3x more l3 cache per core | |||
More threads | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 148.92 $/year | vs | 192.72 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 40.95 $/year | vs | 53 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 4 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 4.7 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Nov, 2012 | Release date 8 months later |
Features Key features of the Itanium 9540 vs FX 9590
clock speed
Itanium 9540
2.13 GHz
FX 9590
4.7 GHz
L2 cache
Itanium 9540
4 MB
FX 9590
8 MB
L3 cache
Itanium 9540
24 MB
FX 9590
8 MB
TDP
Itanium 9540
170W
FX 9590
220W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9540 | vs | FX 9590 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
Cores | Octa core | Octa core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 1248 | |||
AM3+ | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 170W | 220W | |
Annual home energy cost | 40.95 $/year | 53 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 148.92 $/year | 192.72 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 138.13W | 178.75W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | Yes | Yes |
details | Itanium 9540 | vs | FX 9590 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 16 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 3 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 32 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 8 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Itanium 9540 ![]() | AMD FX 9590 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $350 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $128 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $272 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $250 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i5 6600K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $240 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i5 4690K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $180 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs 8370 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||