Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9520

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9520

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 6 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 3.2x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Nov, 2012 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Core i5 2400

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 2400

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 80% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Lower typical power consumption 93.6W vs 105.63W More than 10% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 27.75 $/year vs 31.32 $/year More than 10% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 100.92 $/year vs 113.88 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9520  vs Core i5 2400 

clock speed

Itanium 9520
1.73 GHz
Core i5 2400
3.1 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9520  vs
Core i5 2400 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 95W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 27.75 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 100.92 $/year
Typical power consumption 105.63W 93.6W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 6,400 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Itanium 9520  vs
Core i5 2400 
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC Yes No
Intel Itanium 9520
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 2400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus