Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9520

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9520

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 2.67 MB/core Around 90% more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 20 MB vs 16 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 8 4 more threads

Features Key features of the Itanium 9520  vs Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 

clock speed

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9520  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Hexa core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

Typical power consumption 105.63W N/A

details

Itanium 9520  vs
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 
Threads 8 12
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 16 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 2.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 14 nm
Intel Itanium 9520
Report a correction
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus