Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9350

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9350

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 8 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Significantly lower typical power consumption 150.31W vs 178.75W More than 15% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 44.57 $/year vs 53 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 162.06 $/year vs 192.72 $/year More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 9590

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9590

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 4.7 GHz vs 1.73 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 5 GHz vs 1.87 GHz Around 2.8x higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jul, 2013 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 3 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9350  vs FX 9590 

clock speed

Itanium 9350
1.73 GHz
FX 9590
4.7 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9350
1.87 GHz
FX 9590
5 GHz

L2 cache

FX 9590
8 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9350
24 MB
FX 9590
8 MB

TDP

FX 9590
220W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9350  vs
FX 9590 
Clock speed 1.73 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.87 GHz 5 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core
Socket type
LGA 1248
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 185W 220W
Annual home energy cost 44.57 $/year 53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 162.06 $/year 192.72 $/year
Typical power consumption 150.31W 178.75W

details

Itanium 9350  vs
FX 9590 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 24 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 6 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Itanium 9350
Report a correction
AMD FX 9590
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus