Intel Itanium 9350 vs AMD FX 9590 |
Released February, 2010
Intel Itanium 9350
- 1.73 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9350
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Much more l3 cache 24 MB |
| | Much more l3 cache per core 6 MB/core | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 150.31W |
VS
Released July, 2013
AMD FX 9590
- 4.7 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD FX 9590
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Much higher clock speed 4.7 GHz |
| | Much higher turbo clock speed 5 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l3 cache | 24 MB | vs | 8 MB | 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 6 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 6x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 150.31W | vs | 178.75W | More than 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 44.57 $/year | vs | 53 $/year | More than 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 162.06 $/year | vs | 192.72 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 2 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4.7 GHz | vs | 1.73 GHz | Around 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 5 GHz | vs | 1.87 GHz | Around 2.8x higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More cores | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2013 | vs | Feb, 2010 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Itanium 9350 vs FX 9590
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9350 | vs | FX 9590 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 4.7 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 5 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1248 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 185W | 220W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 44.57 $/year | 53 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 162.06 $/year | 192.72 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 150.31W | 178.75W | |
details | Itanium 9350 | vs | FX 9590 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 6 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Itanium 9350  Report a correction |  AMD FX 9590 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $128 | $230 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $230 | |
| AMD FX 8370 vs 9590 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
| | VS | |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
