Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9340

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9340

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 6 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 3.2x more l3 cache per core
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 3630QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 3630QM

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz More than 95% higher turbo clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 150.31W 4.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 44.57 $/year 4.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 162.06 $/year 4.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9340  vs Core i7 3630QM 

clock speed

Itanium 9340
1.6 GHz
Core i7 3630QM
2.4 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9340
1.73 GHz
Core i7 3630QM
3.4 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9340  vs
Core i7 3630QM 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.73 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 185W 45W
Annual home energy cost 44.57 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 162.06 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 150.31W 36.56W

details

Itanium 9340  vs
Core i7 3630QM 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Intel Itanium 9340
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 3630QM
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus