Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9330

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 6 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 3.2x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year vs 38.81 $/year Around 5% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of Intel Core i5 3570K

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3570K

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 1.46 GHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2.2x higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Lower typical power consumption 107.5W vs 125.94W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Newer Apr, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 106 $/year vs 135.78 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9330  vs Core i5 3570K 

clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.46 GHz
Core i5 3570K
3.4 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.6 GHz
Core i5 3570K
3.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9330  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Clock speed 1.46 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 77W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 38.81 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 106 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 107.5W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Itanium 9330  vs
Core i5 3570K 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 10.x
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,150 MHz
3DMark06 N/A 5,339.9
Intel Itanium 9330
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3570K
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus