Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9330

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 6 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 3.2x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i5 3470

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3470

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 1.46 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz 2.2x higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 86.05W vs 125.94W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 84.62 $/year vs 135.78 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 31.22 $/year vs 37.34 $/year More than 15% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9330  vs Core i5 3470 

clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.46 GHz
Core i5 3470
3.2 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.6 GHz
Core i5 3470
3.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9330  vs
Core i5 3470 
Clock speed 1.46 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 77W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 31.22 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 84.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 86.05W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Data rate 19,200 MB/s 2,560 MB/s
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Itanium 9330  vs
Core i5 3470 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz
Intel Itanium 9330
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3470
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus