Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9330

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache 20 MB vs 2 MB 10x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 5x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of Intel Celeron 1000M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1000M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 125.94W 4.4x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.46 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 37.34 $/year 4.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 135.78 $/year 4.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9330  vs Celeron 1000M 

clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.46 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9330  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Clock speed 1.46 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1248
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 35W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 28.44W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s
Clock speed 2,400 MHz 100 MHz

details

Itanium 9330  vs
Celeron 1000M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz
Intel Itanium 9330
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1000M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus