Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9330

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l3 cache 20 MB vs 8 MB 2.5x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 5x more l3 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 125.94W vs 159.66W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year vs 56.1 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year vs 159.62 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 1.46 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 4.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 2.8x higher turbo clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 8 vs 4 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9330  vs FX 8350 

clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.46 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9330
1.6 GHz
FX 8350
4.2 GHz

L2 cache

FX 8350
8 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9330
20 MB
FX 8350
8 MB

TDP

FX 8350
125W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9330  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 1.46 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.6 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core
Socket type
LGA 1248
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 125W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 159.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 2,400 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Itanium 9330  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 8
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 20 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Itanium 9330
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus