Intel Itanium 9320 vs Core i7 4770K |
Released February, 2010
Intel Itanium 9320
- 1.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9320
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | More l3 cache 16 MB | | Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core |
VS
Released June, 2013
Intel Core i7 4770K
- 3.5 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 4770K
| | Much higher clock speed 3.5 GHz | | Much higher turbo clock speed 3.9 GHz |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More l3 cache | 16 MB | vs | 8 MB | 2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 2 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.5 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | Around 2.8x higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 3.9 GHz | vs | 1.47 GHz | Around 2.8x higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 68.25W | vs | 125.94W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jun, 2013 | vs | Feb, 2010 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | vs | 37.34 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | vs | 135.78 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Itanium 9320 vs Core i7 4770K
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9320 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 155W | 84W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 37.34 $/year | 20.24 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 135.78 $/year | 73.58 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 125.94W | 68.25W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
| Transfer rate | 4,800 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Itanium 9320 | vs | Core i7 4770K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 8 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,250 MHz | |
 Intel Itanium 9320  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 4770K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $272 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $192 | |
| 4770K vs 4670K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $128 | |
| 4770K vs 8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $264 | |
| 4770K vs 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $260 | |
| 4770K vs 4820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $248 | $280 | |
| 4770K vs 4770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
