Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9320

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l3 cache 16 MB vs 3 MB More than 5.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 2.8x more l3 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.33 GHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 125.94W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 37.34 $/year 2.8x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 135.78 $/year 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9320  vs Core i3 3220 

clock speed

Itanium 9320
1.33 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9320  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1248
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 55W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 44.69W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Itanium 9320  vs
Core i3 3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 4
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz
Intel Itanium 9320
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus