Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9320

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 1 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 2 6 more threads
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD A6 4455M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 4455M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.47 GHz More than 75% higher turbo clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 125.94W 9.1x lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.33 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 37.34 $/year 9.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 135.78 $/year 9.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer May, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9320  vs A6 4455M 

clock speed

Itanium 9320
1.33 GHz
A6 4455M
2.1 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9320
1.47 GHz
A6 4455M
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Itanium 9320
16 MB
A6 4455M
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9320  vs
A6 4455M 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.47 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 17W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 13.81W

details

Itanium 9320  vs
A6 4455M 
Threads 8 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7500G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 327 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 424 MHz
Intel Itanium 9320
Report a correction
AMD A6 4455M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus