Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9320

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9320

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 1 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.33 MB/core 12x more l3 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 3 5 more threads
More cores 4 vs 3 1 more cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD A6 3500

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3500

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 65% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 2.1 GHz vs 1.33 GHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 125.94W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 37.34 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 135.78 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9320  vs A6 3500 

clock speed

Itanium 9320
1.33 GHz
A6 3500
2.1 GHz

turbo clock speed

Itanium 9320
1.47 GHz
A6 3500
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

A6 3500
3 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9320
16 MB
A6 3500
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9320  vs
A6 3500 
Clock speed 1.33 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 1.47 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Quad core Tri core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 155W 65W
Annual home energy cost 37.34 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 135.78 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 125.94W 52.81W

details

Itanium 9320  vs
A6 3500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 8 3
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.33 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6530D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 443 MHz
Intel Itanium 9320
Report a correction
AMD A6 3500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus