Intel Itanium 9310 vs Core2 Duo T7400 |
Released February, 2010
Intel Itanium 9310
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9310
 | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Newer Feb, 2010 |
| | More threads 4 |
VS
Released August, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo T7400
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo T7400
| | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much lower typical power consumption 27.63W |
| | Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Feb, 2010 | vs | Aug, 2006 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 1 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 27.63W | vs | 105.63W | 3.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.19 $/year | vs | 31.32 $/year | 3.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 29.78 $/year | vs | 113.88 $/year | 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Itanium 9310 vs Core2 Duo T7400
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9310 | vs | Core2 Duo T7400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.16 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 1248 | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 130W | 34W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 31.32 $/year | 8.19 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 113.88 $/year | 29.78 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 105.63W | 27.63W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | QPI | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 2,400 MHz | 667 MHz | |
details | Itanium 9310 | vs | Core2 Duo T7400 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Itanium 9310  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Duo T7400 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $213 | ||
| T7600 vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $213 | ||
| T7200 vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $213 | ||
| 600E vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $177 | $213 | |
| T5500 vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $213 | ||
| T2400 vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $48 | $213 | |
| 440 vs T7400 | ||
 | VS | |
| $213 | ||
| T5600 vs T7400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
