Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9310

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core More than 3.2x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 10 MB vs 3 MB More than 3.2x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Front view of Intel Core i5 3210M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 3210M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 105.63W 3.7x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 31.32 $/year 3.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 113.88 $/year 3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 2 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9310  vs Core i5 3210M 

clock speed

Itanium 9310
1.6 GHz
Core i5 3210M
2.5 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9310  vs
Core i5 3210M 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 1248
rPGA 988B

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 35W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 105.63W 28.44W

bus

Architecture QPI DMI 2.0
Number of links 1 1
Data rate 19,200 MB/s 2,560 MB/s
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

Itanium 9310  vs
Core i5 3210M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD 4000
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz
Intel Itanium 9310
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 3210M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus