Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9310

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9310

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 5 MB/core vs 2 MB/core 2.5x more l3 cache per core
Slightly more l3 cache 10 MB vs 8 MB 25% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Lower annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year vs 34.18 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 4100

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4100

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 1 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz 2.2x higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Feb, 2010 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Itanium 9310  vs FX 4100 

clock speed

Itanium 9310
1.6 GHz
FX 4100
3.6 GHz

L2 cache

FX 4100
4 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9310
10 MB
FX 4100
8 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9310  vs
FX 4100 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
LGA 1248
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 130W 95W
Annual home energy cost 31.32 $/year 34.18 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 113.88 $/year 114.41 $/year
Typical power consumption 105.63W N/A

bus

Architecture QPI HyperTransport 3.1
Number of links 1 1
Data rate 19,200 MB/s 10,400 MB/s
Transfer rate 4,800 MT/s 5,200 MT/s
Clock speed 2,400 MHz 3,200 MHz

details

Itanium 9310  vs
FX 4100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 10 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Itanium 9310
Report a correction
AMD FX 4100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus