Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9150M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9150M

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 12 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 3 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Higher Maximum operating temperature 76 °C vs 65 °C More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i3 6100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 6100

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.7 GHz vs 1.66 GHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 84.5W 2x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 7 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9150M  vs Core i3 6100 

clock speed

Itanium 9150M
1.66 GHz
Core i3 6100
3.7 GHz

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9150M  vs
Core i3 6100 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 3.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 104W 51W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 12.29 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 44.68 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 41.44W

details

Itanium 9150M  vs
Core i3 6100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L3 cache 24 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 12 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 65°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 530
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Itanium 9150M
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 6100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus