Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9150M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9150M

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.13 MB 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache per core 12 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 12 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 24 MB l3 cache is just OK
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Higher Maximum operating temperature 76 °C vs 70 °C Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Sempron 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3000+

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 50.38W vs 84.5W More than 40% lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year vs 25.05 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year vs 91.1 $/year More than 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9150M  vs Sempron 3000+ 

clock speed

Itanium 9150M
1.66 GHz
Sempron 3000+
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9150M  vs
Sempron 3000+ 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Itanium 9150M  vs
Sempron 3000+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
L3 cache 24 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 12 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 104W 62W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 14.94 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 54.31 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 50.38W

bus

Clock speed 667 MHz 200 MHz
Intel Itanium 9150M
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus