Intel Itanium 9140N vs 9040 |
Released October, 2007
Intel Itanium 9140N
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9140N
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Newer Oct, 2007 |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9040
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 9040
| | Much more l2 cache 18 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 9 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newer | Oct, 2007 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 18 MB | vs | 2 MB | 9x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 9 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 9x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Itanium 9140N vs 9040
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9140N | vs | 9040 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | No | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Itanium 9140N | vs | 9040 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 18 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 9 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 18 MB | 18 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 9 MB/core | 9 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Transistor count | 1,720,000,000 | 1,720,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 76°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 104W | 104W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.05 $/year | 25.05 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.1 $/year | 91.1 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 84.5W | 84.5W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz | |
 Intel Itanium 9140N  Report a correction |  Intel Itanium 9040 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $1,611 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-4617 vs Itanium 9140N | ||
 | VS | |
| $300 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Xeon E5 2609 v2 vs Itanium 9140N | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Itanium 9140N | ||
 | VS |  |
| $2,650 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Itanium 9540 vs 9040 | ||
 | VS | |
| $946 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Itanium 9310 vs 9040 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | $1,980 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs Itanium 9040 | ||
 | VS | |
| $128 | $1,980 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Itanium 9040 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
