0 Comments
| Intel Itanium 9140N vs 9040 |
Released October, 2007
Intel Itanium 9140N
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9140N
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Newer Oct, 2007 |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9040
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 9040
![]() | Much more l2 cache 18 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 9 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer | Oct, 2007 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 18 MB | vs | 2 MB | 9x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 9 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 9x more l2 cache per core |
Features Key features of the Itanium 9140N vs 9040
clock speed
Itanium 9140N
1.6 GHz
Itanium 9040
1.6 GHz
L2 cache
Itanium 9140N
2 MB
Itanium 9040
18 MB
L3 cache
Itanium 9140N
18 MB
Itanium 9040
18 MB
TDP
Itanium 9140N
104W
Itanium 9040
104W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9140N | vs | 9040 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | No | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
details | Itanium 9140N | vs | 9040 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 18 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 9 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 18 MB | 18 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 9 MB/core | 9 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 1,720,000,000 | 1,720,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 4 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 76°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 104W | 104W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.05 $/year | 25.05 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.1 $/year | 91.1 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 84.5W | 84.5W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
Intel Itanium 9140N ![]() | Intel Itanium 9040 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,611 | $1,980 | |
Intel Xeon E5-4617 vs Itanium 9140N | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $1,980 | |
Intel Xeon E5 2609 v2 vs Itanium 9140N | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,980 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Itanium 9140N | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$2,650 | $1,980 | |
Intel Itanium 9540 vs 9040 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$946 | $1,980 | |
Intel Itanium 9310 vs 9040 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $1,980 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs Itanium 9040 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $1,980 | |
AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Itanium 9040 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||