Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9140M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9140M

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 9 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache 18 MB vs 6 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 2670QM

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 2670QM

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.66 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 84.5W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 76 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Newer Oct, 2011 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9140M  vs Core i7 2670QM 

clock speed

Itanium 9140M
1.66 GHz
Core i7 2670QM
2.2 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9140M  vs
Core i7 2670QM 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 2.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD Graphics 3000
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,100 MHz

details

Itanium 9140M  vs
Core i7 2670QM 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 18 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 9 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 100°C

power consumption

TDP 104W 45W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 36.56W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Itanium 9140M
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 2670QM
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus