Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9140M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9140M

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 9 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 36x more l3 cache per core
Much more l3 cache 18 MB vs 0.5 MB 36x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Higher Maximum operating temperature 76 °C vs 71.5 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD A4 3400

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 3400

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 1.66 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 84.5W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2011 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 25.05 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 91.1 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9140M  vs A4 3400 

clock speed

Itanium 9140M
1.66 GHz
A4 3400
2.7 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

A4 3400
0.5 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9140M  vs
A4 3400 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6410D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 600 MHz

details

Itanium 9140M  vs
A4 3400 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 18 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 9 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,720,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 71.5°C

power consumption

TDP 104W 65W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 52.81W
Intel Itanium 9140M
Report a correction
AMD A4 3400
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus