Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9130M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9130M

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 16x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD A4 4355M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 4355M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 84.5W 6.1x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 1.9 GHz vs 1.66 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 76 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Oct, 2007 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 6.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 6.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9130M  vs A4 4355M 

clock speed

Itanium 9130M
1.66 GHz
A4 4355M
1.9 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

A4 4355M
0.5 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9130M  vs
A4 4355M 
Clock speed 1.66 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7400G
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 327 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 424 MHz

details

Itanium 9130M  vs
A4 4355M 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,720,000,000 1,303,000,000
Max CPUs 4 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 100°C

power consumption

TDP 104W 17W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 13.81W
Intel Itanium 9130M
Report a correction
AMD A4 4355M
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus