Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9030

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 2 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Front view of Intel Celeron 1037U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 1037U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 84.5W 6.1x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 76 °C Around 40% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2013 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 6.1x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 6.1x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9030  vs Celeron 1037U 

clock speed

Itanium 9030
1.6 GHz
Celeron 1037U
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9030  vs
Celeron 1037U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 350 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Itanium 9030  vs
Celeron 1037U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Clock multiplier 12 18
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 105°C

power consumption

TDP 104W 17W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 4.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 14.89 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 13.81W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Itanium 9030
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 1037U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus