Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Itanium 9030

Front view of Intel Itanium 9030
Front view of AMD E2 3200

AMD E2 3200

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9030

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9030

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 16x more l3 cache per core
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 0.5 MB 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 76 °C vs 71.5 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 84.5W Around 40% lower typical power consumption
Newer Nov, 2019 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 13 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 25.05 $/year Around 40% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 91.1 $/year Around 40% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9030  vs E2 3200 

clock speed

Itanium 9030
1.6 GHz
E2 3200
2.4 GHz

L2 cache

Itanium 9030
8 MB
E2 3200
1 MB

L3 cache

Itanium 9030
8 MB
E2 3200
0.5 MB

TDP

Itanium 9030
104W
E2 3200
65W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Itanium 9030  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features
Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A AMD Radeon HD 6370D

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in

details

 Itanium 9030  vs
E2 3200 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 8 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 8 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 4 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 1,720,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 4 1
Voltage range 1.09 - 1.25V 0.91 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 76°C Unknown - 71.5°C

power consumption
TDP 104W 65W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 52.81W
Intel Itanium 9030
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss