0 Comments
| Intel Itanium 9030 vs AMD E2 1800 |
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9030
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9030
![]() | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 4 MB/core |
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 | ![]() | Much more l3 cache per core 4 MB/core |
VS
Released June, 2012
AMD E2 1800
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E2 1800
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 1 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 16x more l3 cache per core | |||
More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 16x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 84.5W | 5.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 100 °C | vs | 76 °C | More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Newer | Jun, 2012 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 25.05 $/year | 5.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 91.1 $/year | 5.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Itanium 9030 vs E2 1800
clock speed
Itanium 9030
1.6 GHz
E2 1800
1.7 GHz
L2 cache
Itanium 9030
8 MB
E2 1800
1 MB
L3 cache
Itanium 9030
8 MB
E2 1800
0.5 MB
TDP
Itanium 9030
104W
E2 1800
18W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9030 | vs | E2 1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 7340 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 523 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 680 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in |
details | Itanium 9030 | vs | E2 1800 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 4 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 4 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 12 | 5 | |
Voltage range | 1.09 - 1.25V | 0.88 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 100°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 104W | 18W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.05 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.1 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 84.5W | 14.63W |
Intel Itanium 9030 ![]() | AMD E2 1800 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||