Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9020

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9020

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 24x more l2 cache per core
Much more l3 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Significantly more l3 cache 12 MB vs 3 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Front view of Intel Core i5 6200U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i5 6200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 1.42 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 84.5W 6.9x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jul, 2015 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 9 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 6.9x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 6.9x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9020  vs Core i5 6200U 

clock speed

Itanium 9020
1.42 GHz
Core i5 6200U
2.3 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9020  vs
Core i5 6200U 
Clock speed 1.42 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 104W 15W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 12.19W

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No

details

Itanium 9020  vs
Core i5 6200U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 12 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 6 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 12 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 6 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 4 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 520
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,000 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Itanium 9020
Report a correction
Intel Core i5 6200U
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus