0 Comments
| Intel Itanium 9020 vs AMD A10 7400P |
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9020
- 1.42 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9020
![]() | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 6 MB/core |
VS
Released May, 2014
AMD A10 7400P
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 7400P
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 4 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 6 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.42 GHz | More than 75% higher clock speed | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 84.5W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Newer | May, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 102 °C | vs | 76 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 25.05 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 91.1 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Itanium 9020 vs A10 7400P
clock speed
Itanium 9020
1.42 GHz
A10 7400P
2.5 GHz
L2 cache
Itanium 9020
12 MB
A10 7400P
4 MB
TDP
Itanium 9020
104W
A10 7400P
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9020 | vs | A10 7400P |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.42 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 104W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 25.05 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 91.1 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 84.5W | 28.44W |
details | Itanium 9020 | vs | A10 7400P |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 6 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 28 nm | |
Clock multiplier | 10 | 25 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 102°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ R6 | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 576 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 654 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in |
Intel Itanium 9020 ![]() | AMD A10 7400P ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||