Intel Itanium 9020 vs AMD A10 7400P |
Released July, 2006
Intel Itanium 9020
- 1.42 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Itanium 9020
 | Much more l2 cache 12 MB | | Much more l2 cache per core 6 MB/core |
VS
Released May, 2014
AMD A10 7400P
- 2.5 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD A10 7400P
| | Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm | | Significantly higher clock speed 2.5 GHz |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 12 MB | vs | 4 MB | 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 6 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 28 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.5 GHz | vs | 1.42 GHz | More than 75% higher clock speed | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 84.5W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Newer | May, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 7 years later | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 102 °C | vs | 76 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 25.05 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 91.1 $/year | 3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Itanium 9020 vs A10 7400P
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Itanium 9020 | vs | A10 7400P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.42 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 104W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.05 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.1 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 84.5W | 28.44W | |
details | Itanium 9020 | vs | A10 7400P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 6 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 28 nm | |
| Clock multiplier | 10 | 25 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 76°C | Unknown - 102°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ R6 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 576 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 654 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
 Intel Itanium 9020  Report a correction |  AMD A10 7400P Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
