Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 9015

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 9015

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 12 MB vs 0.5 MB 24x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 6 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 12x more l2 cache per core
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of Intel Atom D425

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D425

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 84.5W 10.4x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Higher clock speed 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jun, 2010 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 10.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 10.4x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 9015  vs Atom D425 

clock speed

Itanium 9015
1.4 GHz
Atom D425
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

Itanium 9015
12 MB
Atom D425
0.5 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 9015  vs
Atom D425 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 104W 10W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 8.76 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Itanium 9015  vs
Atom D425 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 12 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 6 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 1,720,000,000 123,000,000
Max CPUs 4 1
Voltage range 1.09 - 1.25V 0.8 - 1.18V

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Itanium 9015
Report a correction
Intel Atom D425
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus