Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 2 9152

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 2 9152

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 12 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 6 MB 4x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i7 6700HQ

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i7 6700HQ

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly higher clock speed 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 84.5W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 8 vs 4 Twice as many threads
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 2.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 2 9152  vs Core i7 6700HQ 

clock speed

Itanium 2 9152
1.6 GHz
Core i7 6700HQ
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 2 9152  vs
Core i7 6700HQ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 104W 45W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 39.42 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 36.56W

details

Itanium 2 9152  vs
Core i7 6700HQ 
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 24 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 12 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Intel Itanium 2 9152
Report a correction
Intel Core i7 6700HQ
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus