Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 2 9152

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 2 9152

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 30.2W vs 84.5W 2.8x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year vs 91.1 $/year 3.2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 12 $/year vs 25.05 $/year 2.1x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 2 9152  vs E 350 

clock speed

Itanium 2 9152
1.6 GHz
E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

E 350
1 MB

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 2 9152  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

details

Itanium 2 9152  vs
E 350 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 4 1

power consumption

TDP 104W 18W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 28.21 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 30.2W
Intel Itanium 2 9152
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus