Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Itanium 2 9052

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 2 9052

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache per core 12 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core 8x more l3 cache per core
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 24 MB vs 3 MB 8x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Much lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 84.5W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 25.05 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 91.1 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Itanium 2 9052  vs Core i3 3220 

clock speed

Itanium 2 9052
1.6 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Itanium 2 9052  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 104W 55W
Annual home energy cost 25.05 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.1 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 84.5W 44.69W

details

Itanium 2 9052  vs
Core i3 3220 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
L3 cache 24 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 12 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 4 1
Intel Itanium 2 9052
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus