Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel G3920

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel G3920

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel G3920

Reasons to consider the
Intel G3920

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per dollar 3.28 pt/$ vs 1.14 pt/$ More than 2.8x better performance per dollar
Much lower typical power consumption 41.44W vs 98.28W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.55 GHz vs 3.23 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jan, 2011 Release date over 4 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year vs 37.88 $/year 3.1x lower annual home energy cost
Better performance per watt 3.34 pt/W vs 1.41 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,779 vs 1,583 More than 10% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year vs 93.47 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.64 GHz vs 3.23 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 2100

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 2100

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz vs 350 MHz Around 2.5x higher GPU clock speed
Higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of G3920 vs Core i3 2100

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

G3920
3,457
Core i3 2100
3,664

PassMark (Single Core)

G3920
1,779
Core i3 2100
1,583

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

G3920  vs
Core i3 2100 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 51W 65W
Annual home energy cost 12.29 $/year 37.88 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 44.68 $/year 93.47 $/year
Performance per watt 3.34 pt/W 1.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption 41.44W 98.28W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Transfer rate 8,000 MT/s 5,000 MT/s

details

G3920  vs
Core i3 2100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L3 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.55 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.64 GHz 3.23 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.55 GHz 3.23 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics 510 Intel® HD Graphics 2000
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 350 MHz 850 MHz
Turbo clock speed 950 MHz 1,100 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 65,536 MB 32,768 MB
Intel G3920
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 2100
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus